Mobile, Alabama | Pensacola, Florida | Ft. Walton Beach, Florida | News, Weather & Sports
 

Employer sanctions and discrimination

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 4/13/2007 5:36 pm
U.S. citizens, permanent residents, refugees, those seeking political asylum, persons with visas issued specifically so that they can work with a particular employer, and persons issued an employment authorization document, or EAD (E-A-D), by the Immigration and Naturalization Service are allowed to work in the United States. Individuals who aren’t documented, or who have nonimmigrant visas that don't allow employment can’t work legally in the U.S. In order to encourage employment practices that both adhere to immigration laws as well as anti-discrimination laws, the Immigration and Control Act, or IRCA (I-R-C-A), created employer sanction laws to specifically outline an employer’s legal obligations when hiring workers. Basically, these laws require all employers to make sure that job applicants are authorized to work in the United States before hiring them. To do so, employers must verify employment authorization for all hired employees using INS (I-N-S) Form I-9 (eye-nine). Employers must ensure that new employees fill out the I-9 form within the first three days of employment and that each employee provides the required documents proving eligibility for employment, even if the employee is a U.S. citizen by birth. Employers must accept whatever documents are shown, as long as they’re designated by the INS on the I-9 form as acceptable proof of the identity and employment verification of each employee. Employers must make a good faith effort to determine that the documents are valid. They then must keep the I-9 form on file for three years after the date of hire or one year after the employee no longer works for the company, whichever is later. The I-9 serves two functions: it allows employers to assist the INS in enforcing the immigration laws and it’s used as evidence against an employer who fails to complete and store the forms properly, whether or not any of its employees are illegal aliens. Any violation of the employer sanctions laws may result in civil and criminal penalties of up to $3,000 (three thousand dollars) for each unauthorized working alien and a prison sentence up of to six months. The INS conducts over 60,000 (sixty thousand) I-9 inspections per year. In addition to verifying employment status, employers must also be careful to adhere to anti-discrimination laws. This means an employer can’t ask during a job interview what the job applicant’s employment status is, as this could constitute illegal discrimination. Instead, the employer can notify the applicant that should the job be offered, he or she is expected to provide evidence of being legally entitled to work in the U.S. The employer should say this to every job candidate and avoid saying this selectively to foreign-born candidates. Furthermore, an employer who singles out a particular nationality or ethnic group and performs a higher level of scrutiny on their documents over other candidates may face penalties under anti-discrimination laws. Citizens and non-citizens must be treated equally in completing the I-9 form. Employer sanctions laws are a very complex area of law, and employers who don’t understand their obligations should ask the INS for a copy of an employer sanctions handbook.
Share
Send us your question
*Your Full Name:

*Your Email Address:

Phone: (optional)

City: (optional)

State: (optional)

*Subject:

*Question:


Incorrect please try again
Enter the words shown above Enter the numbers you hear
Refresh Image Audio Help


This information is sent to our expert(s). Please see our Ask The Expert/Pro Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Ratliff Law Firm
Robert RatliffRobert Ratliff is one of the Country’s most dedicated post-conviction and criminal defense attorneys. A graduate of the University of Pittsburgh where he received a B.A. and the University of Cincinnati Taft College of Law where he received his Juris Doctorate, Mr. Ratliff has practiced law in the State of Ohio and Alabama and has appeared in State and Federal courts throughout the United States. Mr. Ratliff is admitted to practice before all Federal Courts of Appeal, the United States Supreme Court and numerous District Courts.

Mr. Ratliff is a tireless advocate of the constitutional rights of individuals. He has represented people charged in criminal matters throughout the United States and overseas. At every opportunity Mr. Ratliff has fought for the rights of individuals and against the oppression of the Government. Mr. Ratliff is also the publisher and author of the monthly newsletter, Ratliff’s Law Review which has provided attorney’s, inmates and their families with concise and updated legal analysis on today’s most important criminal defense developments.*

*The following language is required pursuant to Rule 7.2, Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.